×
eLife reviews preprints in the life sciences and medicine, and is committed to improving peer review to better convey the assessments made by editors and ...
People also ask
eLife is changing its editorial process to emphasize public reviews and assessments of preprints by eliminating accept/reject decisions after peer review.
eLife is changing its editorial process to emphasize public reviews and assessments of preprints by eliminating accept/reject decisions after peer review.
Oct 20, 2022 · Peer review is a collaborative process at eLife. Editors and reviewers, who are all active researchers in their fields, discuss their reviews ...
Oct 20, 2022 · eLife will emphasise the public peer review of preprints, restoring author autonomy and promoting the assessment of scientists based on what, ...
Submit your research. eLife is embracing a new publishing model that combines the immediacy of preprints with the value of our consultative peer review process.
Sep 22, 2020 · At eLife, editors and reviewers discuss their reviews with each other before reaching a decision on a manuscript. The overall aim is to make ...
Nov 7, 2019 · Michael Eisen, eLife's Editor-in-Chief, reflects on lessons learned from a recent peer-review trial, and describes how eLife aims to make peer ...
Oct 20, 2022 · From next year, we will no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process; rather, all papers that have been peer- ...
Mar 30, 2023 · In the new model, authors still receive a high-quality peer-reviewed eLife publication. However, it's different in two key ways. Firstly, all ...