×
Mar 22, 2009 · Yes, there are good reasons. You can have semantically meaningful true keys, rather than articificial identity keys. Also, it is not a good idea ...
People also ask
May 6, 2009 · Technically, you can have tables without a primary key, but you'll be breaking good database design rules. Share.
Missing: 671773/ | Show results with:671773/
Sep 1, 2012 · If the rows are unique, you can have a two-column primary key, although maybe that's database dependent. Here's an example: CREATE TABLE ...
Missing: 671773/ reasons-
Jul 12, 2016 · I've run into a problem where I need to regularly insert records into a table, but the integer primary key column is not an identity column. If ...
Missing: 671773/ | Show results with:671773/
Mar 13, 2013 · You should always have a primary key. Having a primary key will allow SQL Server to physically store the data in a more efficient manner.
Missing: 671773/ | Show results with:671773/
Dec 27, 2012 · For a primary key to be an Integer, is easier to manage, and makes its index more effective. As you know, while the keys are auto indexed, the ...
Missing: 671773/ reasons-
Yes, there are good reasons. You can have semantically meaningful true keys, rather than articificial identity keys. Also, it is not a good idea to have a ...
... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6430/how-to ... any-negative-impacts-when-using-mod-rewrite</loc> ... database</loc><lastmod>2015-10-08</lastmod></url> ...
Feb 8, 2017 · Some tables don't need a PRIMARY KEY, because they are never going to be updated, and might only have a tiny set of data in them (e.g. lookup ...
Missing: 671773/ integer-
Jan 7, 2011 · a table that just collects data (for persistence purposes) to be queried itself and not related to other tables where the other tables needed to ...
Missing: 671773/ | Show results with:671773/
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 10 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.