×
May 7, 2015 · Primary keys are not required, and your table will work just fine. Here are some reasons why I almost always use primary keys.
People also ask
Mar 25, 2010 · Technically, you can declare such a table. But in your case, the time should be made the PRIMARY KEY , since it's probably wrong to have ...
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Jun 14, 2014 · It's not always necessary to have a primary key, most DBMS' will allow you to construct a table without one (a).
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Aug 8, 2008 · My database is merge-replicated across a bunch of servers, so I've shied away from identity int columns as they're a bit hairy to get right in ...
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Dec 2, 2019 · I have 4 tables in DB, and they are regularly connected. Now i have to make new table without new primary key, but it must have foreighn key ...
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Jul 30, 2014 · The query I'm using is this: int? UserId = db.StudentModel//the question mark here makes the int nullable .
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Nov 11, 2017 · No. Every table should have some column (or set of columns) that uniquely identifies one and only one row. It makes it much easier to maintain ...
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Dec 7, 2017 · I am using a query builder to build a query. I have 2 tables linked by 2 primary keys which exist in each table. This Query 1 is working fine ...
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
Oct 27, 2017 · My question is, other than the built in functionality that comes with defining a primary key in SQL Server like Entity Framework stuff etc. Is ...
Missing: 30107247/ | Show results with:30107247/
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 9 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.